Zillow paid its biggest rival $100 million to walk away from the apartment-listing business, and now a federal watchdog is forcing that rival back into the ring.
Quick Take
- The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) says Zillow and Redfin struck an illegal deal in February 2025 that wiped out Redfin as a rental-ad competitor.
- A new settlement cancels the part of that deal that kept Redfin out of the rental-listing market for up to nine years.
- Redfin must now rebuild its rental business and pour money into new listings and features.
- Both companies deny wrongdoing and say the original partnership actually helped renters find more apartments.
What The FTC Says Actually Happened
The FTC’s complaint accuses Zillow and Redfin of striking a secret pact in February 2025. Zillow allegedly handed Redfin $100 million in exchange for Redfin shutting down its own internet listing service for rentals and staying out of that market for years. The agency says this wasn’t a normal business deal. It says it was a payoff designed to erase a real competitor from the apartment-search business.
Zillow and Redfin were not small players fighting over scraps. The FTC’s complaint describes them as two of the three biggest rental-listing advertising networks in the country, with CoStar rounding out the trio. Wiping one of the three biggest networks off the map, the agency argues, meant fewer choices for renters and less pressure on prices for the property managers who pay to advertise.
A federal judge agreed the FTC’s story held together well enough to keep going. In May 2026, Judge Anthony Trenga rejected Zillow and Redfin’s push to toss the case, ruling the FTC had plausibly alleged a real antitrust violation. That decision kept the pressure on both companies as the case barreled toward trial.
The Settlement That Sends Redfin Back Into The Fight
Rather than face a trial, Zillow and Redfin settled with the FTC and five states in August 2026. The core of the deal cancels the very term that started the fight. Redfin no longer has to stay out of the rental-listing market for up to nine years. That restriction, the one at the heart of the FTC’s whole case, is gone.
The order does more than remove a roadblock. It orders Redfin to actually come back swinging, requiring the company to relaunch with far more apartment listings and to make binding commitments to spend millions rebuilding its rental-ad business. The goal, according to the FTC, is a Redfin that competes harder than it did before the original $100 million deal ever happened.
Neither company admitted any wrongdoing as part of the deal, which is standard in settlements like this and worth remembering before anyone calls this a courtroom conviction. Still, the fact that Zillow agreed to unwind the exact arrangement the FTC challenged says plenty about how the case was likely headed.
Zillow And Redfin Tell A Very Different Story
Zillow insists the whole arrangement was good for renters, not bad. The company has said all along that the partnership was “pro-consumer and procompetitive,” and it’s happy the settlement lets that partnership keep going. Zillow argues the deal expanded the number of rental listings people could see and made life easier for property managers trying to fill vacancies.
Redfin backs that up, saying the settlement lets it keep its rental partnership with Zillow through at least 2030 while it builds its own standalone rentals business on the side. Both companies also argued in court filings that the FTC misunderstood how the rental-ad market actually works, calling it a complicated two-sided marketplace of renters and advertisers that the government defined too narrowly.
Zillow paid its biggest rival $100M to walk away from the rental-ad market. Prices jumped ~14.5% once Redfin was gone.
Then the segment ripped: Zillow Rentals hit $209M last quarter, +31% YoY, multifamily +42%. That is what a market with no competitor looks like.
Now the FTC is… pic.twitter.com/jrg6TgobTQ
— Kurt S. Altrichter, CRPS® (@kurtsaltrichter) August 29, 2026
Under the settlement, the Zillow-Redfin partnership doesn’t disappear overnight. Listings will keep flowing across Zillow, Trulia, HotPads, Rent.com, ApartmentGuide and Redfin, and starting in 2027 the two companies plan to roll out standalone multifamily advertising products on top of that. That transition period gives skeptics room to ask how much real competition returns, and how fast.
Whatever side of the argument sounds more convincing, the practical outcome is what matters for renters hunting for their next apartment. A market that briefly narrowed to two dominant players is being forced back open by court order. Whether that translates into lower ad costs trickling down to lower rents is the real test still to come, and it’s one regulators, landlords, and renters alike will be watching closely.
Sources:
redstate.com, ftc.gov, cnbc.com, reuters.com, multifamilydive.com, zillow.com













